<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nouns That Can Only Be Plural</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/</link>
	<description>I Would Not Burn the Library of Alexandria For You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Chekouras</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Chekouras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>habeas corpus (just kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>habeas corpus (just kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siri Gottlieb</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Siri Gottlieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>I read your book review in the NYT and sought you out on the internet. I&#039;m a newcomer to this delicious site. Just feel I should mention, though, that &quot;kudos&quot; is not plural. It is a Greek word meaning honor, glory or acclaim, and is singular.
Correct: Much kudos to you for pulling it off.
Incorrect: Many kudos to you for pulling it off.
Most people aren&#039;t aware of this, but it never hurts to do it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your book review in the NYT and sought you out on the internet. I&#8217;m a newcomer to this delicious site. Just feel I should mention, though, that &#8220;kudos&#8221; is not plural. It is a Greek word meaning honor, glory or acclaim, and is singular.<br />
Correct: Much kudos to you for pulling it off.<br />
Incorrect: Many kudos to you for pulling it off.<br />
Most people aren&#8217;t aware of this, but it never hurts to do it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jincy</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>Thanks for binoculars, glasses, coveralls, tweezers, tongs, and tights.  Not sure about nylons, though. I can imagine the singular of &quot;nylons&quot; being used, as in, &quot;Nylons are cheaper than pantyhose, because if you get a run in one nylon, you can always substitute another.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for binoculars, glasses, coveralls, tweezers, tongs, and tights.  Not sure about nylons, though. I can imagine the singular of &#8220;nylons&#8221; being used, as in, &#8220;Nylons are cheaper than pantyhose, because if you get a run in one nylon, you can always substitute another.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>Hmm--interesting!  

I can think of a few other &quot;things with two parts&quot;-type words: binoculars, glasses. 

More &quot;things with legs&quot;: tights, nylons, coveralls. 

Other pointy scissors/pliers-like things: tweezers, tongs.

I can&#039;t think offhand of others in the thanks/congratulations vein, but I&#039;m going to ponder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8211;interesting!  </p>
<p>I can think of a few other &#8220;things with two parts&#8221;-type words: binoculars, glasses. </p>
<p>More &#8220;things with legs&#8221;: tights, nylons, coveralls. </p>
<p>Other pointy scissors/pliers-like things: tweezers, tongs.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think offhand of others in the thanks/congratulations vein, but I&#8217;m going to ponder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jincy</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>I think cattle is a collective noun, like sheep, or populace...  

What I&#039;m looking for are nouns that end in &quot;s&quot; and can only be plural.  The point is that if a plural ends in &quot;s&quot; it should logically be able to lose the &quot;s&quot; and be singular.  But you can&#039;t do that with pants, scissors, and thanks. 

Hi, Meg!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cattle is a collective noun, like sheep, or populace&#8230;  </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m looking for are nouns that end in &#8220;s&#8221; and can only be plural.  The point is that if a plural ends in &#8220;s&#8221; it should logically be able to lose the &#8220;s&#8221; and be singular.  But you can&#8217;t do that with pants, scissors, and thanks. </p>
<p>Hi, Meg!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>More plural nouns:

cattle
mail

And yet some are determinedly singular:

hair
moose

I might add that cattle is the only generic word I can come up with for cows and bulls together, which has always frustrated me since it seems to refer to the meat version, but not the dairy variety.  Why isn&#039;t there a generic form like sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, etc?  Are there other animal words like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More plural nouns:</p>
<p>cattle<br />
mail</p>
<p>And yet some are determinedly singular:</p>
<p>hair<br />
moose</p>
<p>I might add that cattle is the only generic word I can come up with for cows and bulls together, which has always frustrated me since it seems to refer to the meat version, but not the dairy variety.  Why isn&#8217;t there a generic form like sheep, goats, chickens, turkeys, etc?  Are there other animal words like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Kristin</title>
		<link>http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/2009/12/08/nouns-that-can-only-be-plural/comment-page-1/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Kristin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/?p=304#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>Continuing in the &quot;things with legs&quot; vein:
jeans
shorts
trousers
(although all three of these, when used in a compound noun become singular, as in jean-skirt, short-skirt (now &quot;skort&quot;) and trouser-press)
Also, thanks and congratulations seem to always be plural, tho I am not sure why, since they have no legs. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing in the &#8220;things with legs&#8221; vein:<br />
jeans<br />
shorts<br />
trousers<br />
(although all three of these, when used in a compound noun become singular, as in jean-skirt, short-skirt (now &#8220;skort&#8221;) and trouser-press)<br />
Also, thanks and congratulations seem to always be plural, tho I am not sure why, since they have no legs. <img src='http://www.jincywillett.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
